<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snow Censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.questionmarc.co.uk/content/snow-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.questionmarc.co.uk/content/snow-censorship/</link>
	<description>"The Phantom Piddler"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Preacher</title>
		<link>http://www.questionmarc.co.uk/content/snow-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Preacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.questionmarc.co.uk/?p=81#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Whoever it was it was a touch of genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoever it was it was a touch of genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.questionmarc.co.uk/content/snow-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.questionmarc.co.uk/?p=81#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Higgs

Many thanks for this. I&#039;ve added your very helpful research as a postscript to the original blog post.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Higgs</p>
<p>Many thanks for this. I&#8217;ve added your very helpful research as a postscript to the original blog post.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higgs</title>
		<link>http://www.questionmarc.co.uk/content/snow-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Higgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.questionmarc.co.uk/?p=81#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Bent Society, after a little research I may be able to add light to your skepticism. The BBC DID apparently censor the image (there are discussions about this on various pages across the internet). At 10 o&#039;clock the Market Square webcam goes offline and whatever was on the screen at that time freezes on their site until 8 in the morning. The image wasn&#039;t censored until later on that night so was displayed &quot;accurately&quot; for an hour or so before someone clocked it at the beeb. 

However the same image WAS displayed all night on the Nottingham Council website which was NOT censored. So effectively the BBC are lying.

The two webcam urls are here -they both display the same pictures (unless the bbc decide to modify theirs of course):

http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/www/marketsquare/webcam.asp
http://www.bbc.co.uk/nottingham/content/webcams/old_market_square_webcam.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bent Society, after a little research I may be able to add light to your skepticism. The BBC DID apparently censor the image (there are discussions about this on various pages across the internet). At 10 o&#8217;clock the Market Square webcam goes offline and whatever was on the screen at that time freezes on their site until 8 in the morning. The image wasn&#8217;t censored until later on that night so was displayed &#8220;accurately&#8221; for an hour or so before someone clocked it at the beeb. </p>
<p>However the same image WAS displayed all night on the Nottingham Council website which was NOT censored. So effectively the BBC are lying.</p>
<p>The two webcam urls are here -they both display the same pictures (unless the bbc decide to modify theirs of course):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/www/marketsquare/webcam.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/www/marketsquare/webcam.asp</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/nottingham/content/webcams/old_market_square_webcam.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/nottingham/content/webcams/old_market_square_webcam.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.questionmarc.co.uk/content/snow-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.questionmarc.co.uk/?p=81#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Visit the Bent Society Blog to try to get to the truth behind this. (story is here: http://bentsocietyblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/crafty-censorship-is-at-centre-of-our.html )...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visit the Bent Society Blog to try to get to the truth behind this. (story is here: <a href="http://bentsocietyblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/crafty-censorship-is-at-centre-of-our.html" rel="nofollow">http://bentsocietyblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/crafty-censorship-is-at-centre-of-our.html</a> )&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bent Society</title>
		<link>http://www.questionmarc.co.uk/content/snow-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Bent Society</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.questionmarc.co.uk/?p=81#comment-62</guid>
		<description>If the BBC deleted the &quot;C&quot; word then how did you get the picture with the same time on it with the word deleted? You should have saved this one for April fools day Qmarc. I like the double-twist-protest on the BBC censorship though...still gets us thinking.

And then what if the original &quot;C&quot; word image is a fraud? In that case you put the record straight.

How will we ever know?

I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the BBC deleted the &#8220;C&#8221; word then how did you get the picture with the same time on it with the word deleted? You should have saved this one for April fools day Qmarc. I like the double-twist-protest on the BBC censorship though&#8230;still gets us thinking.</p>
<p>And then what if the original &#8220;C&#8221; word image is a fraud? In that case you put the record straight.</p>
<p>How will we ever know?</p>
<p>I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
